Monday, July 9, 2012

Final Personal Model of Reading Theory

The most important thing for teachers to be aware of is that students learn best through a whole-to-part literacy structure. Constance Weaver explains it perfectly in Reading Process & Practice when she states,
“As children have more and more experience with print, development proceeds not from part to whole, but from whole to part: from being read to, to being able to read; from an understanding that print represents speech to being able to match spoken words to print words; from perceiving print words as whole units to being able to analyze print words into units that represent onsets and rimes” (2002, p.369).
Whole-to-part literacy most nearly means not teaching individual rules or strategies, but teaching them through reading and writing so that the students can see them in their appropriate contextual environment. We can accomplish this through a comprehensive literacy program with reading and writing workshops.
In a comprehensive literacy approach “teachers and students attend to skill-related knowledge like phonics by drawing examples from texts being read and relating the skills back to their reading. [While] teachers…help children master letter formation, spelling patterns, and punctuation when the children use writing as a means of expressing themselves, communicating and coming to know and understand new concepts and experiences” (Weaver, 2002, p.3). Therefore, reading and writing need to be taught in conjunction with one another in order to further the students’ understanding of particular concepts. As started in Breaking Ground: Teachers Relate Reading and Writing in the Elementary School, “Reading and writing would be allowed to flow and develop in an interactive process, each supporting and enhancing the other. [Graves] had watched the strong effect of writing process on children’s reading in previous years and marveled. The two processes seemed to go together naturally” (Graves, 1985, p.16).  
            The more children are able to participate in reading experiences the stronger their reading and writing is going to get. First, the teacher needs to demonstrate various reading and writing strategies rather than simply explaining them and expecting the students to fully understand. This quote from Inside Writing: How to Teach the Details of Craft explains it perfectly:
“It is unheard of for a math teacher not to show the art of solving problems on the chalkboard. An artist paints with his class, a science teacher illustrates the art of investigation and documentation, and a coach shows how she spreads her fingers to control a basketball. Good teaching means demonstrating the decisions and skills required to participate in the field of study or endeavor being taught” (Graves & Kittle, 2005, p. 1).
Through read-alouds and shared reading, the students will be able to hear and see the print on the page, as well as listen to the teacher orally go through different reading strategies. When the students see the teacher using these strategies and what they accomplish, they will begin to understand their importance in comprehension. The same goes for writing; teachers can allow students to experience the writing process through write-alouds and shared writing. With this strategy, the students will be able to see a piece of work from conception to brainstorming to final publication. These activities will also build student background knowledge of various topics. Background knowledge is vital to fluency and comprehension, as well as the writing process because if students have never heard of something how can they be expected to read or write about it. They will also build student’s word familiarity because the students will be getting more and more exposure to various types of words.
            Once the students have seen the reading and writing process, it is time for them to try it on their own through guided reading/writing, sustained reading/writing. This way the students can take what they have learned through demonstration and begin to read and write on their own. Because students had a lot of exposure to different types of words through teacher-lead activities, they will be able to figure out unfamiliar words through analogy, in order words comparing the unknown word to familiar words in order to figure out its pronunciation. This is when students begin to segment words into recognizable “chunks” such as syllables or onsets and rimes. However, teacher scaffolding and mini-lessons do not stop here- teachers need to keep in constant contact with students through reading/writing conferences. These conferences are used to check on the student’s progress and see if they are having any troubles with any of the strategies or content. This is the time where teachers can resolve any issues with the students individually.
            With that said, through a whole-to-part comprehensive literacy approach students are more apt to gain more knowledge and understanding through reading and writing. Students learn more naturally through whole-to-part compared to part-to-whole because they are able to use and build upon the surrounding context. “Evidence suggest that many emergent and less proficient readers develop phonics knowledge most readily by learning whole words and deriving phonics knowledge from them, rather than by learning phonics first” (Weaver, 2002, p.57). The less time students focus on “decoding” words through phoneme-grapheme relationships, the more time they will be able to spend on comprehending the given passage.

Resources
Graves, D. (1985). Breaking ground: Teachers relate reading and writing in the elementary schools. New Hampshire : Heinemann.
Graves, D., & Kittle, P. (2005). Inside writing: How to teache the details of craft. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Retrieved from http://www.heinemann.com/shared/onlineresources/002154/part1.pdf
Weaver, C. (2002). Reading process and practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.

No comments:

Post a Comment